Michael Chihlas c2c126d0cd Fix frontend nginx to use Railway PORT variable
- Use envsubst to inject PORT at runtime
- Template nginx.conf with ${PORT} placeholder

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-31 23:29:05 -05:00

Patherly

Take the path MOST traveled.

Project Status: 🚀 Phase 2 - Active Development

Backend: Complete and tested (18 API endpoints, 40+ integration tests) Frontend: Core features complete, Tree Editor in progress Tree Editor: Visual editor with form-based editing and live preview panel


The Problem

MSP engineers face constant context switching between diverse technical issues (file shares, server outages, VPN failures, Active Directory problems). This creates:

  • Cognitive overload: 15-25 minutes to regain focus after each context switch
  • Inconsistent documentation: Under pressure, notes are rushed or incomplete
  • Lost tribal knowledge: Best troubleshooting paths live only in senior engineers' heads
  • Repeated work: Same issues investigated from scratch each time
  • Burnout: Research shows context switching is a major contributor to burnout

The Solution

An intelligent decision tree system that:

Guides engineers through proven troubleshooting paths
Captures decisions and notes automatically as you work
Generates professional ticket documentation with one click
Builds institutional knowledge that improves over time
Reduces cognitive load during high-stress situations

Success Metric

If Michael (our primary user) uses this tool for 50% of his tickets in 3 months, we've succeeded.


Key Features

MVP (Weeks 1-3)

  • 🌳 Tree Navigation - Step-by-step guided troubleshooting
  • 📝 Automatic Notes - Capture context at each decision point
  • 📄 Export - Generate professional documentation (plain text, markdown, HTML)
  • 🔐 Multi-User - Team authentication and access control
  • 📚 Documentation Links - Contextual links to KB articles and vendor docs

Phase 2 (Weeks 4-6)

  • 👥 Team Management - Controlled authorship, shared access
  • ✏️ Tree Editor - Visual interface to create/modify decision trees
  • 📱 Mobile Responsive - Works on phone/tablet for on-site work
  • 🔀 Custom Branches - Add unique steps on-the-fly during troubleshooting
  • 🔍 Search & Categories - Find the right tree quickly

Phase 3 (Weeks 7-12)

  • 📎 Attachments - Upload screenshots, logs, command outputs
  • 💾 Offline Mode - Continue working without internet, sync when back online
  • 🏢 Client Context - Auto-fill client-specific details (server names, topologies)
  • 📧 Send to Engineer - Generate simplified checklist for onsite techs
  • 📊 Analytics - Track usage, common paths, team performance

Phase 4 (Months 4-6)

  • 🔌 API & Integrations - Connect to ConnectWise, Kaseya, LabTech
  • Automation - Execute PowerShell scripts directly from trees
  • 🏢 Enterprise Features - SSO, white-labeling, advanced RBAC
  • 🌐 Marketplace - Share and discover community-contributed trees

Tech Stack

Frontend

  • React - Modern, flexible, excellent offline support
  • Tailwind CSS - Rapid UI development
  • Service Workers - Offline capability
  • IndexedDB - Local data storage

Backend

  • Python FastAPI - Modern, fast, async support
  • SQLAlchemy - ORM with async support
  • PostgreSQL - Reliable database with excellent JSON support
  • Alembic - Database migrations

Infrastructure

  • S3-Compatible Storage - File attachments (MinIO for dev, S3/Spaces for prod)
  • Railway/Render - Simple hosting to start
  • Docker - Containerized development environment

Project Structure

troubleshooting-tree-app/
├── docs/
│   ├── 01-PROJECT-OVERVIEW.md          # Vision, goals, market analysis
│   ├── 02-TECHNICAL-ARCHITECTURE.md    # System design, data models, API specs
│   ├── 03-DEVELOPMENT-ROADMAP.md       # Phases, timeline, milestones
│   ├── 04-FEATURE-SPECIFICATIONS.md    # Detailed feature descriptions
│   └── 05-QUESTIONS-AND-ACTION-ITEMS.md # Decisions needed, next steps
├── backend/                             # Python FastAPI application (future)
├── frontend/                            # React application (future)
├── database/                            # Database schemas, migrations (future)
└── README.md                            # This file

Getting Started

For Michael (Primary User)

Immediate Action Items:

  1. Answer Key Questions (see docs/05-QUESTIONS-AND-ACTION-ITEMS.md)

    • Timeline needs
    • Budget for hosting
    • Team size
    • Branding preferences
  2. Document 5 Troubleshooting Scenarios

    • Citrix VDA Not Registering
    • FSLogix Profile Issues
    • Active Directory Replication Failure
    • SonicWall VPN Tunnel Down
    • User Unable to Access File Share

    See template in 05-QUESTIONS-AND-ACTION-ITEMS.md

  3. Provide Sample Export

    • Show how you currently write ticket notes
    • What format/level of detail is needed
  4. Review Documentation

    • Read through all docs in docs/ folder
    • Flag anything unclear or that you disagree with
    • Add your own thoughts/ideas

For Developers (Future)

Once development starts:

  1. Clone repository
  2. Set up development environment (Docker)
  3. Install dependencies
  4. Run migrations
  5. Start development servers
  6. See CONTRIBUTING.md for coding standards

Development Principles

  1. User First - Every feature must solve a real problem for Michael and his team
  2. Speed Matters - Tool must be faster than doing it manually
  3. Progressive Enhancement - Start simple, add complexity only when needed
  4. Offline Capable - Many MSP sites have poor connectivity
  5. Automation-Ready - Architecture supports future integration with scripts/tools
  6. Documentation Over Memory - Capture tribal knowledge explicitly
  7. Fail Gracefully - Never lose user's work, even if server fails

Use Cases

Scenario 1: Standard Troubleshooting

Michael gets a ticket: "User can't access file share"

  1. Opens app, selects "File Share Access Issues" tree
  2. Enters ticket number, client name
  3. Follows decision tree, making selections and adding notes
  4. Reaches resolution in 10 minutes
  5. Clicks "Export", copies formatted notes into ticket
  6. Done - professional documentation with zero extra effort

Scenario 2: Complex Multi-Step Issue

Michael troubleshooting Citrix VDA registration failure

  1. Starts with "VDA Not Registering" tree
  2. Discovers network issue, branches to "Network Connectivity" tree
  3. Finds firewall blocking traffic, attaches screenshot of rule
  4. Returns to VDA tree, continues troubleshooting
  5. Automation script restarts services, captures output
  6. VDA registers successfully
  7. Exports comprehensive notes showing entire diagnostic path

Scenario 3: Junior Engineer Learning

New engineer Sarah gets escalated Active Directory issue

  1. Selects "AD Replication Failure" tree (created by Michael)
  2. Tree guides her step-by-step with commands to run
  3. At each step, links to Microsoft Learn docs explain concepts
  4. She adds detailed notes about what she found
  5. Reaches point requiring senior help, shares session link with Michael
  6. Michael reviews her work, sees exactly what she tried
  7. Guides her through final steps over Slack
  8. Sarah learns the process, documents it properly

Scenario 4: On-Site Technician

Michael needs hands at a remote site

  1. Creates troubleshooting plan in app
  2. Clicks "Send to Engineer", generates simplified checklist
  3. Sends link to on-site tech via text
  4. Tech follows steps, checks boxes, adds photos of error messages
  5. Reports back results in real-time
  6. Michael adjusts plan remotely if needed
  7. Issue resolved with minimal back-and-forth

Why This Could Be Special

For Individual Engineers

  • Save 30+ minutes per complex ticket
  • Never lose track of troubleshooting progress
  • Professional documentation every time
  • Learn from experienced engineers' approaches
  • Build personal knowledge base over time

For MSP Teams

  • Standardize troubleshooting procedures
  • Onboard junior engineers faster
  • Capture institutional knowledge before engineers leave
  • Improve ticket documentation quality
  • Identify training gaps and common issues
  • Track team performance and efficiency

For the Market

  • 30,000+ MSPs in North America alone
  • Adjacent markets: Internal IT, DevOps, Technical Support
  • Current solutions are either too generic (flowchart tools) or too rigid (static runbooks)
  • Unique Value: Purpose-built for technical troubleshooting with automation integration

Potential Business Model

  • Free Tier: Personal use, limited trees
  • Pro Tier: $15-25/user/month - Team features, unlimited trees, analytics
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing - API, SSO, white-labeling
  • Marketplace: Revenue share on community trees
  • Professional Services: Custom tree development, training, consulting

Inspiration & Similar Tools

What Exists Today

  • ServiceNow Knowledge Base - Good for static docs, not interactive troubleshooting
  • IT Glue - Documentation repository, not a troubleshooting guide
  • Confluence Decision Trees - Generic flowcharts, not execution-focused
  • Custom Runbooks - Static, not adaptive, no automation

What We're Building

Imagine if ServiceNow Knowledge, Flowchart tools, and PowerShell automation had a baby specifically designed for MSP troubleshooting. That's this.


FAQ

Q: Why not just use a wiki or documentation system?
A: Wikis are great for reference, but they don't guide you through troubleshooting in real-time or automatically generate ticket notes from your actions.

Q: Won't creating trees take more time than just doing the work?
A: Initially, yes. But after 2-3 uses of a tree, you've saved more time than you spent creating it. Plus, the tree captures knowledge that helps the entire team.

Q: What if the tree doesn't cover my specific issue?
A: You can add custom branches on-the-fly during troubleshooting. These custom paths can then be incorporated into the tree for next time.

Q: How is this different from a flowchart tool?
A: Flowcharts are static diagrams. This is an active troubleshooting companion that captures your work and generates documentation.

Q: Can I use this offline?
A: Yes (Phase 3). Trees are cached locally, you can work offline, and changes sync when you're back online.

Q: Will this replace my ticketing system?
A: No, it complements it. You still create tickets in your PSA, but this generates the detailed notes you paste into tickets.

Q: Can I automate steps?
A: Yes (Phase 4). Integrate PowerShell scripts and other automation that can be triggered directly from decision nodes.


Contributing

This is currently a private project in planning phase. Once we move to active development, we'll create a CONTRIBUTING.md with:

  • Code of conduct
  • Development workflow
  • Coding standards
  • Testing requirements
  • PR process

Contact & Feedback

Primary User: Michael Chihlas
Project Lead: [To be determined]
Communication: [To be determined]

For questions, suggestions, or to get involved, contact Michael.


License

[To be determined]

Options being considered:

  • Open source (MIT/Apache 2.0) - maximize adoption
  • Source-available with commercial license - protect business interests
  • Proprietary - if building as commercial product

Acknowledgments

  • Research on context switching and burnout that inspired this project
  • MSP community for sharing their pain points and workflows
  • All the engineers who've struggled with documentation and wished for a better way

Roadmap at a Glance

└─ [✅ Planning] COMPLETE
   ├─ ✅ Document requirements
   ├─ ✅ Make key decisions
   └─ ✅ Setup initial architecture

└─ [✅ Phase 1: MVP] COMPLETE
   ├─ ✅ Backend API (18 endpoints)
   ├─ ✅ Tree navigation UI
   ├─ ✅ Session tracking
   └─ ✅ Export functionality

└─ [🚀 Phase 2: Team Ready] ← IN PROGRESS
   ├─ ✅ Tree Editor (form-based with preview)
   ├─ ⏳ Team management
   └─ ⏳ Mobile responsive

└─ [📋 Phase 3: Professional]
   ├─ Attachments
   ├─ Offline mode
   └─ Analytics

└─ [📋 Phase 4: Platform]
   ├─ API & integrations
   ├─ Automation
   └─ Enterprise features

Last Updated: 2026-01-28 Project Status: Phase 2 - Active Development Next Milestone: Complete Tree Editor polishing, Team management features

Description
Troubleshooting decision tree application for MSP engineers - automatically generates professional documentation from guided diagnostic workflows
Readme 16 MiB
Languages
Python 54.7%
TypeScript 43.5%
HTML 1.1%
CSS 0.6%