docs(ai): refresh handoff for compute swap
All checks were successful
Mirror to GitHub / mirror (push) Successful in 5s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 5m8s
CI / backend (pull_request) Successful in 9m46s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 10m16s

- HANDOFF: rewritten resume point. First action on resume is `git push`
  (commits 0f00ee5 and 665530f are local-only). Visual QA + bug bash is
  the active work; 4 plan-locked items + the structural task-lane fix
  all need real-browser verification.
- CURRENT_TASK: add 0f00ee5 and 665530f to the commit table; reframe
  "Just shipped" as a per-commit summary; flag the task-lane fix as
  needing visual confirmation.
- SESSION_LOG: chronological entry for this session with full detail
  (audit, four polish items, race-condition wiring, structural
  task-lane fix, test status, files touched).
- DECISIONS: new entry "Tag the task-lane state with an owner chatId"
  documenting the structural pattern, what was rejected, and the
  forward implication that future task-lane state slices follow the
  same owner-tagging pattern.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-04-28 08:21:23 -04:00
parent 665530f812
commit b7d7ff06d2
4 changed files with 73 additions and 39 deletions

View File

@@ -12,6 +12,20 @@
---
## 2026-04-28 02:00 EDT — Claude Code — Plan-locked wedge polish + structural task-lane fix
- Audited `docs/plans/2026-04-27-escalation-mode-wedge-design.md` against the branch and identified four locked-design / Codex-correction items not yet shipped: live AI assessment refresh, suggested-step chips, unread 6px dot on queue cards, and race-condition toast on claim conflict.
- Shipped all four in commit `0f00ee5`:
- **Live AI assessment refresh.** New `HandoffAssessmentReadyEvent` type and `onAssessmentReady` handler on `streamEscalations`. `AssistantChatPage` opens a scoped SSE subscription whenever it tracks a handoff missing its AI assessment; on a matching event it calls `handoffsApi.listHandoffs(sessionId)`, finds the handoff by id, and replaces both `magicHandoff` and `overlayHandoff` in place. Closes the loop on the async-assessment commit `e8ba74e` — without this, the senior had to manually reopen the Context overlay to see the AI assessment when the background task finished.
- **Suggested-step chips.** New `chipsHidden` state in `AssistantChatPage`; chip strip renders above the composer when the magic-moment dissolves and `magicHandoff?.ai_assessment_data?.suggested_steps[]` is non-empty. Click prefills input and focuses; first send via `handleSend` flips `setChipsHidden(true)`; explicit X button also hides. Per-session lifetime by design (Codex correction locked).
- **Unread 6px dot.** localStorage-backed seen set (`rf-escalation-seen`, capped at 200 entries) hydrated in `EscalationQueue`. Card render adds a 6px `bg-accent` dot when not in the seen set. `markSeen` called on Pick Up click AND on card body click (the "open" affordance). Hover deliberately doesn't clear (Codex correction). Pick Up button's onClick now calls `e.stopPropagation()` so it doesn't double-fire the card-open path.
- **Race-condition toast on claim conflict.** New `HandoffAlreadyClaimedError` exception class in `handoff_manager.py`. `claim_session` now eager-loads `claimed_by_user` via `selectinload`, rejects different-user re-claims (idempotent for same-user double-clicks), and raises with `claimed_by_id` / `claimed_by_name` / `claimed_at`. The endpoint translates to HTTP 409 with structured `detail = {error: 'already_claimed', claimed_by_id, claimed_by_name, claimed_at}`. `AssistantChatPage.handleStartHere` extracts via `axios.isAxiosError`, formats `"Already claimed by {name} {time_ago}."` using the existing `timeAgo()` helper, drops `?pickup=true`, and dismisses the magic-moment so the loser flows back to the queue. Backed by 2 new unit tests (`test_claim_session_conflict_raises_already_claimed`, `test_claim_session_idempotent_for_same_user`).
- User then reported that the task-lane stale-flash bug was still happening despite the prior fix `8914391` — "every time we work on something that's related to this, when we go back to test we create a new session and then the task lane shows unrelated session data." The previous fix only covered mount-time entry paths (prefill + pickup); any in-place transition still flashed.
- Shipped structural fix in commit `665530f`. Introduced `taskLaneOwnerChatId` state that explicitly tags which chatId the in-memory `activeQuestions` / `activeActions` / `showTaskLane` values belong to. Set at every populate site (sendPrefill, selectChat, handleSend, handleTaskSubmit, handleResumeNew, refreshFacts, handleApplyFix). Cleared in `resetSessionDerivedState`. Persistence effect now writes `chatId: taskLaneOwnerChatId` (was `activeChatId` — that was the original write-side bug). Render gate `taskLaneIsForActiveChat = ownerChatId === activeChatId` ANDed into all three render conditions. The lane is structurally unable to display data tagged with a different chat. See DECISIONS entry. **Not yet verified in a real browser** — user is swapping computers and asked for the handoff first.
- The two commits `0f00ee5` and `665530f` are **local-only** at session end. The user did not explicitly authorize a push, so per the handoff rule the branch was left unpushed. First action on resume is `git push`.
- Tests: full handoff + escalation suite (`test_handoff_manager.py`, `test_session_handoffs_api.py`, `test_escalation_bus.py`, `test_flowpilot_analytics_escalations.py`) → 34 passed in 68.89s. Frontend `tsc -b` exit 0 after each commit.
- Files touched: `frontend/src/api/aiSessions.ts`, `frontend/src/components/flowpilot/EscalationQueue.tsx`, `frontend/src/pages/AssistantChatPage.tsx`, `frontend/src/types/ai-session.ts`, `backend/app/api/endpoints/session_handoffs.py`, `backend/app/services/handoff_manager.py`, `backend/tests/test_handoff_manager.py`, `.ai/CURRENT_TASK.md`, `.ai/HANDOFF.md`, `.ai/SESSION_LOG.md`, `.ai/DECISIONS.md`.
## 2026-04-27 22:30 EDT — Claude Code — Escalation Mode: unify /escalate through HandoffManager
- User pushed back on the dual-path proposal: "why would we want two different escalation methods? Should the new one just be the way we escalate regardless if we're using a PSA or not using a PSA?" Right answer. Unified everything through `HandoffManager`.